SiH

Click on the icon info to get details.

Species data

Common Formula	SiH
Stoichiometric Formula	SiH
Name	Silylidyne
Mass	28.98475 a.m.u
Charge	0
CAS	13774-94-2
Inchi	InChI=1S/HSi/h1H
InchiKey	QHGSGZLLHBKSAH-UHFFFAOYSA-N
State	Ground State

Search all reactions with SiH

KIDA SiH

ISM Abundance

log₁₀ Abundance	Reference	Source Name	Source Type	Link

Polarizability

Evaluation	Definition	Value (Å³)	Method	Origin	Reference
	total	3.928	Calculations	Database : NIST COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY COMPARISON AND BENCHMARK DATABASE

Definition: total Value (Å³): 3.928 Method: Calculations Origin: Database : NIST COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY COMPARISON AND BENCHMARK DATABASE Reference:

Dipole moment

Evaluation	Value (D)	Method	Origin	Reference
	0.104	Calculations	Bibliography	Woon, D. E. et al. ;2009;Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series ;185,273-288

Value (D): 0.104 Method: Calculations Origin: Bibliography Reference: Woon, D. E. et al. ;2009;Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series ;185,273-288

Enthalpy of formation

Evaluation	T (K)	Value (kJ.mol^-1)	Method	Origin	Reference
	298	368.64 ±8	Measurements	Database : CCCBDB (http://cccbdb.nist.gov/)
	0	366.94 ±8	Measurements	Database : CCCBDB (http://cccbdb.nist.gov/)

T (K): 298 Value (kJ.mol^-1) : 368.64 ±8 Method: Measurements Origin: Other database Reference:
T (K): 0 Value (kJ.mol^-1) : 366.94 ±8 Method: Measurements Origin: Other database Reference:

Desorption energy

Evaluation	E_mean (K)	E_min (K)	E_max (K)	Pre-exponential factor (s^-1)	Order factor	Method	Origin	Reference	Type of surface	Description
	13000 ±3900	0	0	0.00E+0	1	Calculations	Bibliography	Wakelam, V. et al. ;2017;ArXiv e-prints;,	H2O	To estimate the unknown binding energies (for most of the radicals for example), we have developed a model founded on the stabilization energy of the complex between the various species and one water molecule. Then, we assume that the binding energy of the species with ASW is proportional to the energy of interaction between this species and one water molecule. To determine the proportionality coefficients, we fit the dependency of the experimental binding energies versus the calculated energies of the complexes for 16 stable molecules. Uncertainties in ED is estimated to be 30%. The preexponential factor is to be computed using the Hasegawa et al. (1992) approximation.
	3150	0	0	0.00E+0	1	Estimation	Database : OSU		H2O	This binding energy was listed in the original OSU gas-grain code from Eric Herbst group in 2006. Energy of Si + H. The pre-exponential factor is not given. It can be computed using the formula given in Hasegawa et al. (1992).

E_mean (K): 13000 ±3900 E _min (K): 0 E _max (K): 0 Pre-exponential factor (s^-1): 0.00E+0 Method: Calculations Origin: Bibliography Reference: Wakelam, V. et al. ;2017;ArXiv e-prints;, Type of surface: H2O Description: To estimate the unknown binding energies (for most of the radicals for example), we have developed a model founded on the stabilization energy of the complex between the various species and one water molecule. Then, we assume that the binding energy of the species with ASW is proportional to the energy of interaction between this species and one water molecule. To determine the proportionality coefficients, we fit the dependency of the experimental binding energies versus the calculated energies of the complexes for 16 stable molecules. Uncertainties in ED is estimated to be 30%. The preexponential factor is to be computed using the Hasegawa et al. (1992) approximation. Evaluation:
E_mean (K): 3150 E _min (K): 0 E _max (K): 0 Pre-exponential factor (s^-1): 0.00E+0 Method: Estimation Origin: Other database Reference: Type of surface: H2O Description: This binding energy was listed in the original OSU gas-grain code from Eric Herbst group in 2006. Energy of Si + H. The pre-exponential factor is not given. It can be computed using the formula given in Hasegawa et al. (1992). Evaluation:

Diffusion energy

No data